Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Georgia Court of Appeals found that both in-term and post-termination covenants not to compete in a bakery/deli business franchise agreement were unreasonable and unenforceable in Atlanta Bread Co. Int'l, Inc. v. Lupton Smith, CCH 13,911 (Ga. App. May 14, 2008).
Sean Lupton-Smith owned several Atlanta Bread Company franchises. On Feb. 14, 2006, Atlanta Bread Company notified Smith that it intended to terminate his franchise effective Feb. 24. Atlanta Bread stated that the termination was due to Smith operating a competing business called PJ's Coffee Shop using Atlanta Bread's methods and proprietary information. Smith filed a lawsuit seeking to enjoin the termination and obtained a temporary restraining order. Eventually, the TRO was lifted, and Atlanta Bread purchased the assets of the former franchised stores. Smith then amended his complaint to seek damages for wrongful termination of the franchise agreement. The trial court entered partial summary judgment for Smith, denied Smith's motion for partial judgment on the pleadings, and denied Atlanta Bread Company's motion cross-motion for summary judgment.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.