Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As part of making distributions to allowed claimants of a bankrupt entity, a liquidating trustee must decide the best way to handle potential outstanding tax liabilities. Generally, this decision requires the trustee to decide between two available options; namely:
No prudent trustee would assume any risk relating to alternative (a) above, as once the estate's assets are irretrievably disbursed, the IRS could hold the trustee personally liable. Fortunately, the Bankruptcy Code, in the form of ' 505, equips trustees with effective tools to resolve tax issues and avoid this dilemma.
It is also important to note that ' 505 is available to reorganized debtors, however the stakes are not as high for reorganized debtors as there is generally no trustee left “holding the bag,” but rather the ongoing business would satisfy any final determination of tax owed and concomitantly the returns to the allowed claimholders would rise and fall with the value of the reorganized equity interest. The exception may be the reorganized debtor that liquidates within a few years after the effective date of the bankruptcy. In this generally rare exception, the application of the rules herein apply with similar importance.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.