Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A recent split decision by a New York appellate court in Havana Central v. O'Lunney's Pub Inc., 49 AD3d 70, 852 NYS2d 32 (Dec. 27, 2007), upholding an incoming tenant's claim against a prior tenant for failing to vacate premises at the expiration of its lease, has generated substantial comment and bewilderment in the real estate bar. (The full bench affirmed an order of Justice Louis B. York granting summary judgment dismissing individual defendants as well as the other tort causes of action.)
According to the majority, the landlord's inability to give possession of the premises on the lease commencement date is not just an inconvenient, nonactionable delay. Simply holding over gives rise to a claim for tortious interference with contract. The implication of this decision, were it to be followed, is sufficiently important to warrant examining the court's reasoning more critically. This article focuses on the possible impact of the decision on the real estate leasing market, drafting appropriate lease provisions, and settled landlord/tenant law particularly as it concerns end-of-lease issues.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.