Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Law Firm Partnership & Benefits ReportLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Profits Per Me (PPM)

By Mark Jungers and Jane Sullivan Roberts
September 29, 2008

Over the last 20 years, The American Lawyer's profits per partner (PPP) has become the number America's largest law firms use to keep score. Perhaps more importantly, it is the number lateral partner candidates use to evaluate the strength of a firm and to predict their compensation. While law firm partners generally assume that a higher PPP will result in higher compensation for them, PPP is a surprisingly poor predictor of an individual partner's compensation. PPP is just a measure of the average compensation of the firm's equity partners. As one of our firm's founding partners, Jon Lindsey says, lateral partner candidates need to look beyond PPP and focus on what he calls PPM ' “profits per me.” Averages are great, but how much of the law firm's profits can I fairly expect to get?

We have seen situations where the market compensation for an individual at one set of firms is roughly $500,000 and at another set of firms in the same city is double that for a guaranteed period of time. The difference lies not in the firms' respective PPPs, but rather in the various structural, cultural and historical factors that influence their ability and willingness to pay premium compensation and bonuses, guarantee base compensation, and take creative approaches to attracting talent.

This premium content is locked for Law Firm Partnership & Benefits Report subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.