Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The TDRA Turns Two: But Are Trademark Owners Better Off?
When the Federal Trademark Dilution Act (“FTDA”) was enacted in 1996, it was expected to provide much-needed uniformity and consistency to the protection of famous marks, not to fundamentally change the traditional standard for proving trademark dilution. Under the traditional standard, as adopted in many states, a trademark owner could protect against another's use of the same or similar mark even on noncompeting goods if it could show that such use was likely to blur (or weaken) the distinctive significance of the senior user's mark.
The U.S. Supreme Court, however, saw things differently. In its 2003 decision in Moseley v. V. Secret Catalogue, 537 U.S. 418 (2003), the Court found that the FTDA's language required a showing of “actual dilution,” not “likelihood of dilution.” The Court offered little guidance on how to prove an actual lessening of a mark's distinctive significance, but a few things seemed certain: First, consumer surveys increasingly would be necessary and, more generally, it had just become considerably more difficult to prove a federal dilution claim.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
New York's Latest Cybersecurity Commitment
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
How AI Has Affected PR
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.