Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Imagine a potential industrial tenant visiting a property only to discover workers in hazmat suits in the midst of an environmental remediation project; or the impact of having a prospective tenant find building code violations or lingering evidence of flood damage. Not exactly the ideal scenario for a landlord looking to market its property, but not an unheard-of circumstance, either. The reason is that too often, surrender provisions in today's commercial leases are not adequately coordinated with the landlords' marketing needs, and lack adequate remedies to ensure compliance by tenants at the end of their lease terms. A continuing stream of rental income is the key to the success of any commercial property and it is critical for landlords to take proactive steps to protect the continuity of that income. Landlords can do just that by requiring tenants to comply with some of their typical “surrender” obligations well before the end of their lease terms, by viewing non-compliant tenants as de facto holdovers and invoking remedies traditionally applied when a tenant fails to move out at the end of its lease term.
Because it takes time to find a new tenant, commercial leases generally include a number of clauses designed to give the landlord the opportunity to minimize any interruption in that stream of rental income caused by the transition between tenants. For example, the landlord is usually permitted to post “for rent” signs and show the premises to potential new tenants during the last year of the term so the landlord can identify a new tenant before an existing tenant's lease expires. Also, the existing tenant is usually required to “surrender” the premises in good condition at the end of its lease term in order to minimize the time and expense for the landlord to prepare the premises for a new tenant. If the existing tenant does not vacate the premises at the end of its term, the landlord can usually declare the tenant a “holdover” in order to collect damages and charge the tenant a multiple (usually 150% or 200%) of its rental rate until the tenant vacates the property.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.