Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Federal Banking Authorities Issue
Identity Theft 'Red Flag' Regulations
Federal bank regulators issued a notice of proposed rulemaking concerning identity-theft “red flags” and address discrepancies under sections 114 and 315 of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003. 71 Fed. Reg. 40785 (July 18, 2006). According to the Federal Deposit Insurance Co. press release accompanying the NPR, the proposed regulations would require each financial institution and creditor to develop and implement an identity theft prevention program that includes policies and procedures for detecting, preventing and mitigating identity theft in connection with account openings and existing accounts. The proposed regulations include guidelines listing patterns, practices and specific forms of activity that should raise a “red flag” signaling a risk of identity theft.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.