Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In an era where employment laws continue to evolve, an important, but often overlooked, aspect of legal compliance is an employer's record-keeping procedures. It is not unusual for an employer that is being investigated by a governmental agency in charge of enforcing an employment statute to run afoul of the record-keeping requirements. Sometimes a record-keeping violation can lead an investigator down the path of discovering significant compliance issues not directly connected to the original complaint; most notably, in failure-to-hire or promotion cases.
In addition to the federal statutes reviewed below, employers should check their state law requirements for record-retention provisions and the statute of limitations, including deadlines for tort-type claims, which are increasingly prevalent in today's employment litigation. It should also be noted that where an employer discovers there are federal or state laws specifying different record-retention periods for the same records, the employer should comply with the longer period under either law. As a practical matter, record-retention requirements are extended when records are involved in either administrative or court proceedings, in which case the employer should retain those records for the duration of the litigation until final resolution, including the running of the time limits applicable for appeal. The record-keeping retention provisions reviewed below relate to laws that are largely applicable to the most significant number of employers. Additional record-keeping duties may apply, depending upon specific state law or regulations, such as safety procedures or other specifications applying to particular industries or hiring certain types of workers.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.