Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Presumably, anyone reading this article is aware of the enormously popular Harry Potter series of books, which have sold more than 400 million copies and been translated into 67 languages. If you are a fan of the series, you may also be familiar with “The Harry Potter Lexicon,” a Web site devoted to all things Harry Potter. Since 2000, the Web site has developed a cult following of devoted Harry Potter fans. Even J.K Rowling, the author of the Harry Potter series, has praised the Web site.
It is against this backdrop that the recent decision from Judge Robert P. Patterson in the Southern District of New York received so much attention. The case, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. v. RDR Books, involved claims asserted by J.K. Rowling (“Rowling”) and the owner of the film rights in the Harry Potter series, Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (“Warner Bros.”), for copyright infringement. The allegedly infringing work was a reference guide authored by the creator of the “Harry Potter Lexicon” Web site, Steven Vander Ark (“Vander Ark”). The primary issue in the case was whether the reference guide constituted a fair use.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.