Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
If your firm is like most, much of the month of December seems to focus on compensation. If your firm's compensation system is a retrospective one, partners may be jockeying for their “fair” share of the pie for the current year. If the system is a prospective one, as is the case in my firm, all eyes are looking forward.
Whatever compensation system a firm uses, everyone should agree that the purpose of the system is to allocate the firm's profits equitably among the partners who have contributed to the generation of those profits. Whether that is achieved, of course, may be in the eye of the beholder. In any event, absent a system in which a single person or committee has absolute discretion as to how profits are to be allocated, a compensation system cannot be successful unless it has the confidence of all partners.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.