Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A magistrate for the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California decided that a copyright and trademark infringement defendant couldn't file an impleader action against his former lawyer for secondary or derivative liability. Zero Tolerance Entertainment Inc. v. Ferguson, CV 06-4132-RC. Zero Tolerance, a distributor of adult-oriented movies, sued Shaun Ferguson for publishing its content without authorization on Ferguson's Web site, adultsallowed.com. Ferguson stipulated to a permanent injunction at a court-supervised settlement conference at which he was represented by attorney Marc S. Colen.
After Tolerance later filed a supplemental complaint alleging that Ferguson “continued all of the infringing activities,” Ferguson filed a motion under Rule 14(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for permission to file an impleader against his now-former attorney Colen. Ferguson claimed that Colen hadn't told him that he was violating the settlement agreement. Ferguson sought damages for Colen's alleged breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and a claim of professional negligence.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.