Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In high-technology disputes, a patentee must secure a thorough understanding of often complex and subtle technologies in accused devices to prove patent infringement. Despite a patentee's best efforts to obtain proof of infringement, very often the most convincing evidence of patent infringement ' for example, proprietary design documents of the accused device ' lies within the possession of the alleged infringer itself. The survivability of that core evidence, however, can be under constant threat due to, for example, periodic purging of information pursuant to routine business practice or even bad-faith spoliation efforts by the alleged infringer. The risk to electronic evidence is especially grave because of its susceptibility to rapid erasure. Clearly, the threat of evidence destruction may seriously jeopardize the ability of a patentee to prove its case.
In this article, we examine judicial and other mechanisms in the United States and China that a patentee can utilize to safeguard evidence under the alleged infringer's control. In the United States, patentees need not wait the protracted time required for commencement of formal discovery to seek evidence under immediate threat of destruction. In China, which lacks a judicial construct precisely analogous to American discovery, patentees can employ special judicial and administrative measures even prior to commencement of suit to secure evidence in the hands of the alleged infringer.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.