Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Consider this familiar fact pattern: A small group of bondholders believe that they were misled by a debtor's management about the company's financial situation shortly before the company filed for bankruptcy, and no class action has yet been filed for securities fraud or related claims. The debtor quickly sells its assets and agrees with the creditors committee to file a plan that creates a litigation trust to litigate possible causes of action for the benefit of the creditors. Can the plan provide that the securities claims ' which are not estate causes of action because they belong to the bondholders individually, not to the company ' will be assigned to the trust so that the trust can efficiently litigate these claims and distribute the proceeds thereof to the bondholders?
Until recently, the answer certainly would have been “no”; several cases have held that a plan can not vest a litigation trust with the claims of individual creditors and instead is limited to litigating and collecting claims that belong to the estate. However, recent decisions from the Second and Fourth Circuits as well as dicta in a recent opinion from the Third Circuit suggest that the answer now is “maybe.” This article explores the history, the more recent case law and the open issues, which could be important in structuring a plan in future cases.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.