Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action settlements were expected to hit a three-year high in 2008, according to a new study released by a New York economic consulting firm.
The study, by NERA Economic Consulting, projects that the SEC was on pace to reach 739 settlements by year-end, “continuing a dynamic period of SEC enforcement since the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) in 2002,” said NERA.
Settlements totaled 702 in 2007, and 663 in 2006.
Large Penalties
The post-SOX era also has witnessed the SEC's imposition of record monetary penalties on a range of defendants, according to the study. Before SOX, the largest penalty imposed in an enforcement action against a publicly traded company for financial fraud was a $10 million penalty against Xerox in April 2002. By contrast, according to NERA's research, since SOX, the SEC has imposed penalties of $10 million or more against 115 parties, including 14 that were penalized at least $100 million.
Other Findings
NERA, which has been analyzing trends in securities litigation for more than 15 years, reported other findings, including:
Conclusion
In performing the study, NERA reviewed every SEC litigation release and administrative proceeding document published from July 31, 2002 through Sept. 30, 2008.
Marcia Coyle is a reporter for the National Law Journal, an Incisive Media sister publication of this newsletter.
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action settlements were expected to hit a three-year high in 2008, according to a new study released by a
The study, by NERA Economic Consulting, projects that the SEC was on pace to reach 739 settlements by year-end, “continuing a dynamic period of SEC enforcement since the enactment of Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX) in 2002,” said NERA.
Settlements totaled 702 in 2007, and 663 in 2006.
Large Penalties
The post-SOX era also has witnessed the SEC's imposition of record monetary penalties on a range of defendants, according to the study. Before SOX, the largest penalty imposed in an enforcement action against a publicly traded company for financial fraud was a $10 million penalty against Xerox in April 2002. By contrast, according to NERA's research, since SOX, the SEC has imposed penalties of $10 million or more against 115 parties, including 14 that were penalized at least $100 million.
Other Findings
NERA, which has been analyzing trends in securities litigation for more than 15 years, reported other findings, including:
Conclusion
In performing the study, NERA reviewed every SEC litigation release and administrative proceeding document published from July 31, 2002 through Sept. 30, 2008.
Marcia Coyle is a reporter for the National Law Journal, an Incisive Media sister publication of this newsletter.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?