Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In a continuing effort to provide the latest, most accurate information to physicians, many pharmaceutical manufacturers have been facing a growing public perception that their interactions with health care providers were inappropriate ' or in some cases even unethical. Seeking to remove any appearance of impropriety and reinforce the industry's mission of providing essential medical information, the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (“PhRMA”) recently issued a revised version of its Code on Interactions with Healthcare Professionals that took effect on Jan. 1, 2009 (“revised Code”). The revised Code imposes new “voluntary” restrictions on gifts, meals, distribution of educational items, sponsorship of conferences, and consulting agreements. It also sets forth strict new compliance requirements mandating that chief executive officers and chief compliance officers certify that their companies are implementing policies and procedures designed to foster compliance with the revised Code and verifying the existence of these policies and procedures through periodic outside audits. PhRMA's stated goal for the new Code is to promote “the highest ethical standards as well as all legal requirements.” 2009 PhRMA Code on Interactions with Healthcare Professionals, available at http://www.phrma.org/code_on_interactions_with_healthcare_professionals. Nevertheless, companies should be aware that by raising the bar for the industry, they may be taking on additional legal duties and litigation risks. Government regulators and plaintiffs' attorneys will inevitably take aim at these more restrictive standards and target those companies that fail to meet them.
The impact of the revised Code on a company's business practices will require a careful analysis and action plan to be successful. Failure to comply with the revised Code may have broad implications in terms of regulatory enforcement, product liability litigation and even consumer protection issues. In-house counsel and outside counsel must assess the criminal and civil implications of the revised Code and craft practical policies reflecting its principles. Any analysis should consider the question of how the revised Code might be used against the company in legal proceedings. However, the analysis should also include a discussion as to how the company can use the revised Code to its benefit in potential litigation. If implemented properly, these updated guidelines can help companies protect themselves against unwanted attention from state and federal regulators, as well as the usual character attacks employed by plaintiffs in civil litigation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.