Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Attorneys' Fees Awards: No License to Pickpocket
It is generally thought that a contract provision awarding attorneys' fees to a prevailing party will be enforced. The most recent saga in the Domino's system's equipment dispute confirms this principle, but, at the same time, suggests that courts will, when appropriate, restrict the amount of the award. (Background: In Bores v. Domino's Pizza LLC, 489 F. Supp. 2d 940 (D. Minn. 2007), the trial court ruled in favor of the franchisee-plaintiffs in a dispute about whether the franchisor could impose certain purchasing restrictions on its franchisees. The decision was reversed by the Eight Circuit, which remanded with direction for the trial court to enter judgment in favor of franchisor Domino's. Bores v. Domino's Pizza LLC, 530 F.3d 671 (8th Cir. 2008).) From a counseling standpoint, there are several lessons to be learned from the trial court's ruling, the main lesson being: Don't spend an attorneys' award until the money is in the bank.
If the true objective for awarding attorneys' fees is to reduce the cost of litigation if successful, the first issue for consideration is whether the other party will be able to pay. Usually, this is a problem for the franchisor, and not for the franchisee that prevails, although recent economic downturns might alter the presumption here. In a large percentage of the cases, the franchisee is gasping for air when proceedings have been commenced. Too many franchisees fail or have issues because they are undercapitalized. Where this is the case, the franchisor, if it prevails, may have problems collecting any judgment granted in its favor. Collecting attorneys' fees will only compound a collectability problem that may already exist.
Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.