Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The era of hanging file folders and loose-leaf paper crammed into bulging metal file cabinets is a distant memory. In this digital age, customer records, financial paperwork, and research and development memoranda live on hard drives, servers and back-up tapes, not in bankers' boxes or file cabinets. In response to increasing volumes of electronic data generated and maintained, corporations are forming response teams to develop and implement protocol designed to comply with legal requirements for the preservation and production of electronically stored information (ESI).
This new era of corporate document management has been shaped by amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“FRCP”) and fueled by a sharp decline in corporate wealth and the corresponding uptick in corporate civil case filings. In December 2006, Rules 16, 26, 34 and 37 were amended to accommodate changes in the way information is managed in the context of litigation. Contemporaneously, the market experienced an increase in interest rates, slowing of real estate appreciation, and the economy was caught in the throws of a perfect storm created by the generous economic boom of the preceding decade. As corporate litigation increases in a down economy, businesses have felt the pressure more than ever to take inventory of teir ESI and prepare for the day their ESI management practices are called into question. Concurrently, the amended rules, along with ensuing case-law, have provided sorely needed instruction and guidance to corporations and their counsel regarding ESI discovery in civil lawsuits.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.