Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The recent decision of the Supreme Court of Rhode Island in State v. Lead Indus. Ass'n, 898 A.2d. 1234, 1235 (R.I. 2006), was widely perceived by the American business community as a veritable life saver. The court reversed the trial court's judgment that lead pigment producers should be held liable for the potentially billions of dollars required to remove lead-based paint from hundreds of thousands of residences throughout the state. More broadly, the decision seemed to defuse the ominous potential for a new generation of cases based on “public nuisance” arguments exponentially increasing the liability of businesses in many industries.
However, while the court's decision was an important one, it also may give corporate counsel a false sense of security. It is unlikely that law of public nuisance will return anytime soon to the lowly status it held less than 50 years ago when a Michigan appellate court referred to it as “the great grab bag, the dust bin, of the law.” The state tobacco settlements, resting on public nuisance and similar claims and totaling more than $300 billion, still shine brightly for mass products plaintiffs' attorneys. The Rhode Island litigation provided them with important experience and taught them how to try such claims to jury verdicts. So the question facing corporate counsel is what public nuisance threats remain after the Rhode Island decision.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC The question is whether a debtor's rejection of its agreement granting a license "terminates rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor's breach under applicable nonbankruptcy law."