Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Although the issue of Federal Preemption has grabbed the headlines in medical device and pharmaceutical cases, those analyzing preemption's impact on plaintiff's failure-to-warn claims on other types of products that are subject to federal regulation are significant for their varied results.
For example, the Third and Fourth Circuits have addressed similar, if not identical, claims reaching very different conclusions. Pinney v. Nokia, Inc., 402 F.3d 430 (4th Cir. 2005) and Farina v. Nokia, et al., ____ F.3d _______ (3rd Cir. Sept. 2, 2008) both involved putative class actions brought against various manufacturers, suppliers, lenders, and lessors of wireless hand-held telephones (cell phones), those that provide wireless services for such devices, and two trade associations that represented that such devices were safe to use. The complicated and lengthy procedural history of the cases (the complaint that led to the two separate appellate opinions was first filed on April 19, 2001) raised several issues for both courts to consider, including personal jurisdiction, law of the case, and federal preemption.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.