Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
According to the legislative history accompanying 35 U.S.C. '303(a), Congress intended the re-examination procedure to provide an important “quality check” on patents that would allow the government to remove defective and erroneously granted patents. Indeed, Congress amended 35 U.S.C. '303(a) in 2002 because it disagreed with the restrictive scope of re-examination imposed by the Federal Circuit in In re Portola Packaging Inc., 110 F.3d 786 (Fed. Cir. 1997). In a panel decision by Judge Arthur J. Gajarsa, joined by Judges Alan D. Lourie and William C. Bryson, the court in In re Swanson, 540 F.3d 1368, (Fed. Cir. 2008), held that a piece of prior art relied on for a prior rejection could, nevertheless, create a new question of patentability sufficient to warrant a re-examination. In so ruling, the court made it easier for third parties to invoke the re-examination statute by broadening the ability of prior art, cited or un-cited, to support a re-examination request.
The Case
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.