On Jan. 9, 2009, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, in the SemCrude, L.P., et al. bankruptcy cases, refused to enforce the terms of a valid, pre-bankruptcy agreement that provided for cross-affiliate, multi-party setoff ' a setoff by a creditor holding funds belonging to one or more debtors ' based on a lack of “mutuality” under ' 553 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “SemCrude decision”).
Delaware Bankruptcy Court Denies Multi-Party Setoff
<i>In re SemCrude, L.P.</i> is a departure from the long-standing assumption that a multi-party netting agreement among affiliates would be upheld in bankruptcy if enforceable under applicable non-bankruptcy law. This article provides an analysis of the decision, the procedural status and its potential impact, and recommendations for minimizing the potential negative implications.
This premium content is locked for The Bankruptcy Strategist subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN The Bankruptcy Strategist
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or call 1-877-256-2473.






