Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A couple of years ago few people would have thought that a socially conscious company that specializes in selling organic groceries would find itself in a knock-down, drag-out brawl with the Federal Trade Commission. But that's just what has unfolded as a result of the FTC's challenge of the merger between Whole Foods Market, Inc. and Wild Oats Markets, Inc. While the twists and turns of the FTC's challenge have captivated antitrust aficionados for over a year and a half, there are important lessons for non-antitrust lawyers that may have a merger in their future.
First, the history of the case demonstrates that just because a merger has been consummated doesn't mean the FTC will pack up and go home. In fact, with the economic downturn and fewer mergers taking place, the FTC may very well focus its resources on completed mergers. Second, while every executive is likely to have a definite opinion about which markets their company competes in, that opinion won't carry the day in a merger challenge. Antitrust litigation is driven by competing expert testimony and economic analysis, and a company's market for antitrust purposes may end up being different than what the industry analysts report. Finally, while questionable e-mails and internal company documents may not lead to a loss in court, they can definitely cause problems in a merger challenge. It is, thus, extremely important for companies to have an antitrust compliance program that addresses document creation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.