Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Causes of action alleging violations of state consumer fraud statutes are among the newest weapons in the arsenal of product liability plaintiffs. Instead of solely pleading traditional common law or statutory product liability claims, plaintiffs ' particularly those in drug or medical device cases ' often also allege consumer fraud or unfair trade practices. For plaintiffs, the strategic advantages are the ability to: 1) circumvent the causation requirements of traditional strict liability cases; 2) obtain punitive damages; and 3) recover attorneys' fees and costs from defendants. This litigation tactic, however, is manifestly unfair to product manufacturers and frustrates the policy rationale underlying traditional product liability causes of action.
This article examines: 1) the historical underpinnings of product liability causes of action; 2) the purpose of state consumer fraud statutes and their growing popularity in product liability actions; and 3) one court's analysis regarding the inability of these two claims to be reconciled in a product liability action. The article concludes that permitting consumer fraud claims to continue to be asserted in product defect cases is misguided and thwarts the public interest.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.