Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Yahoo!, the global Internet company, was accused by the families of jailed Chinese dissidents of abetting in the torture of pro-democracy activists by releasing data that allowed China's government to identify, arrest, and imprison the activists. Unocal, a California oil company, has been confronted with charges in a U.S. court of being complicit in the alleged forced labor, rape, and murder of Burmese citizens ' actually committed by the Burmese military government. Chiquita has been sued ' in a U.S. court ' in a case where it admitted paying money to paramilitary groups in Colombia to protect its workers. These companies are not alone. Similar accusations based on the actions of corrupt or repressive foreign regimes have been levied in U.S. courts against many other multinational corporations, including Coca-Cola, Exxon-Mobil, Firestone, and Royal Dutch/Shell.
In recent years, companies doing business in countries where human rights or environmental violations have occurred have found themselves dragged into U.S. courts as defendants in lawsuits brought by foreign plaintiffs to account for violations ' often committed by others, including foreign governments. Although some of these cases are well-known, the legal foundation for the claims is not. An obscure piece of legislation passed more than 200 years ago was raised in the case against Yahoo! and many others like it. Unfortunately, this strategy is only becoming more relevant. Although the statute was initially interpreted to provide redress in limited situations involving foreigners, including to provide comfort to reluctant foreign diplomats traveling to the United States in the post-Revolutionary period, it has more recently been used by U.S. Plaintiff's lawyers as a popular way of hauling multinational corporations into U.S. courts for torts actually committed by others where the companies did business.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.