Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Any employer that has found itself before the EEOC understands the time, energy and cost that goes into defending against an individual employee's claims of unlawful discrimination or retaliation. In an individual disparate treatment case, an employer must be able to clearly and convincingly demonstrate the legitimate non-discriminatory reasons it relied upon to make the business decision that impacted that specific individual. Defending against a systemic discrimination charge, however, is significantly more involved and poses an exponentially greater potential for liability to a company. That is because systemic cases focus on a company-wide pattern or practice that has an adverse impact upon a protected class of individuals. For example, the EEOC has investigated (and resolved) pattern and practice cases involving discriminatory promotion and pay practices negatively impacting employees of Hispanic national origin, retirement programs that result in the selection of older workers, and implementation of layoffs that perpetuate an alleged “glass ceiling” adversely impacting women.
What Is the Current Political Landscape?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.