Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Any employer that has found itself before the EEOC understands the time, energy and cost that goes into defending against an individual employee's claims of unlawful discrimination or retaliation. In an individual disparate treatment case, an employer must be able to clearly and convincingly demonstrate the legitimate non-discriminatory reasons it relied upon to make the business decision that impacted that specific individual. Defending against a systemic discrimination charge, however, is significantly more involved and poses an exponentially greater potential for liability to a company. That is because systemic cases focus on a company-wide pattern or practice that has an adverse impact upon a protected class of individuals. For example, the EEOC has investigated (and resolved) pattern and practice cases involving discriminatory promotion and pay practices negatively impacting employees of Hispanic national origin, retirement programs that result in the selection of older workers, and implementation of layoffs that perpetuate an alleged “glass ceiling” adversely impacting women.
What Is the Current Political Landscape?
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.