Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Alston & Bird LLP has announced that Deepro Mukerjee will join its New York office as a partner in the Intellectual Property Litigation Group. Mukerjee brings extensive experience in intellectual property offerings, including the prosecution, litigation and licensing of patents, in addition to counseling several bio-technology companies.
“Deepro's expansive intellectual property litigation expertise, unique background in life sciences and experience with the FDA adds tremendous value and depth to our intellectual property practice,” said Richard R. Hays, managing partner of Alston & Bird. “He further strengthens our robust intellectual property practice, which boasts both national and international clients.”
Prior to joining Alston & Bird, Mukerjee served as a partner in the intellectual property litigation group at Greenberg Traurig LLP in New York. In this role, he provided business and intellectual property counseling to a wide variety of clients and closed multimillion dollar deals for several bio-technology companies. While his academic background is in molecular and cell biology, Mukerjee also garnered extensive experience in litigating patents directed to a wide variety of technologies, ranging from diagnostic assays to electrical circuit interrupting devices.
“Deepro's expansive intellectual property litigation expertise, unique background in life sciences and experience with the FDA adds tremendous value and depth to our intellectual property practice,” said Richard R. Hays, managing partner of
Prior to joining
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?