Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recently finalized its guidance document entitled “Good Reprint Practices for the Distribution of Medical Journal Articles and Medical Scientific Reference Publications on Unapproved New Uses of Approved Drugs and Approved or Cleared Medical Devices” (the “GRP Guidance”), which describes the conditions under which the agency will allow drug and device companies to disseminate certain off-label use information proactively. Because dissemination of off-label information has the potential to affect product liability exposure, it is worth examining the content of the GRP Guidance carefully. To illustrate the point, I note that the GRP Guidance and the recent sermon of my rabbi share similar characteristics. Both focus on the potential of good news, but also offer a note about caution in saying too much.
My rabbi related a joke he heard: A man is pulled over by a state police officer. The officer informs the driver, “Your license number was drawn in a special lottery, and you won $1 million.” The driver responds, “Even though I don't have my license?” and his wife, in the passenger seat, offers, “Officer, don't listen to a word he says, he's drunk.” The man in the back seat chimes in, “How did he know this is not your car?” I will not attempt to convey my rabbi's moral message from this tale but, for some reason, it made me think of the FDA's GRP Guidance. My mind works in mysterious ways. While the guidance offers pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers guidance about disseminating specific kinds of off-label information according to proscribed conditions, companies must be careful and cautious in recognizing the potential trapdoor of product liability exposure if they say too much.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.