Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For at least the last two decades, law firms have continually expanded their operations across state lines (and national boundaries as well). Even with the current downturn, this trend may slow down, but it most certainly will not abate. Thus, much like any other multistate enterprise, today's law firms have to confront the intriguing and difficult questions of the power of the several states to tax operations that extend across state lines. The controversy is magnified because these are no mere issues of rates and calculations; rather, they take on great significance because they raise constitutional questions. See Sabino, “For Whom The South Central Bell Tolls,” 189 Journal of Accountancy 73 (January 2000) (Alabama's uneven taxation of an out-of-state enterprise violated Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution).
The U.S. Supreme Court recently added another crucial landmark on this constitutional quagmire, in the aspect of the “unitary business” taxation of a multistate enterprise. To be sure, this is only the newest in a long line of cases on the subject, but as such it makes fertile ground for discussion. With that in mind, let us turn to what the High Court now instructs us.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.