Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
With practice groups in business/corporate, real estate, business litigation, intellectual property and private client legal services, Boston-based Burns & Levinson LLP represents dynamic, growth-oriented businesses, privately and publicly held companies, universities, institutions and individuals.
The firm's clients are in various industries from traditional New England manufacturing and service businesses, high-technology and life sciences companies and emerging companies to scientists and entrepreneurs as well as Canadian, Chinese and Israeli-based companies.
After several years using a very vanilla version of Office 97, we decided that we needed to do a complete network upgrade. As a large firm, we were continually struggling with document stability and maintaining a consistent look with the documents we created.
The marketing department created guidelines for our staff to try and maintain a consistency with our documents, but we had no way of effectively making these guidelines easy for people to follow. Staff members were using the “Save As” function from old documents to make things easier, but eventually documents were becoming corrupt as users passed along corruption from one document to another. In addition, we did not use any styles when creating documents and time management became an issue.
As part of the network upgrade, it was very clear that we needed a macro/template package to assist us in both creating a consistent branding and in creating stable, functional documents. The network upgrade also included moving from a Novell/Groupwise environment to a Windows/Outlook one and upgrading all of our desktop machines.
Undertaking such a large upgrade, we knew we were going to be bombarding the users with so many new applications that we wanted to make the transition as easy and as similar to Word (a core application) as possible ' to retain as much “comfort” as we could.
After gathering a list of possible products/vendors, including Esquire Innovations, Legal MacPac, Softwise/Innova and DeltaView, we went through an extensive period of demos and testing. We had each vendor show us its product and selected several to run in our test environment. We also conducted in-depth conversations with other legal IT professionals to get their candid views on the products.
While there are many products out there, we found that Esquire Innovations' iCreate and iRedline products were the best fit for our firm. The two products blend seamlessly with Microsoft Word, a fact that is appreciated by our users who are extremely comfortable with Word. iCreate and iRedline utilize Enhanced Native Architecture' (“ENA”), a term coined by Esquire. ENA is the methodology for retaining the look and feel of Microsoft Word to promote streamlined workflow and reduce end-user training requirements. In addition, by retaining Word's native capabilities, an electronic document can be used for collaboration purposes more effectively.
Implementation
We set up a timeline for the entire upgrade and Esquire representatives came out to our headquarters in Boston to help us customize our templates and toolbars, as well as train our IT department on how to maintain the system going forward. The products were installed on every computer and each user participated in an initial training session.
The roll out of iCreate and iRedline went seamlessly. The tie in to native Word made the learning curve for the end users just as easy as it was for the IT department.
Most of the administration of iCreate and iRedline is done by me or our trainer. The products have been fairly easy to customize to our needs and also to deploy any changes to the end users.
Since installing and implementing iCreate and iRedline, we have upgraded our version with only minimal calls to Esquire for support. The upgrade was a much less daunting experience for us due to the product's ease of use and customer support from Esquire.
Staff members have reacted extremely positively to iCreate and iRedline. This is definitely not something that happened overnight, but as people see the time savings of creating and formatting a document right the first time, they have become advocates.
Key Benefits/Results
iCreate offers enormous capabilities for quickly creating, editing and standardizing legal documents, a problem that had been plaguing our law firm for many years. The product enabled us to stop users from using the “Save As” function for documents, especially primary documents like letters, memos and faxes. As a result we have had a large decline in the number of corrupted documents.
iCreate's “answer screen” has allowed users to input information, tie into “Contacts,” and maintain a certain degree of flexibility in terms of writing style all the while keeping a firm grip on marketing standards. The templates also allow us to embed firm styles and numbering into documents while still enabling users to change them as necessary. It has taken any fear over the use of styles out of the equation.
With a similar interface to iCreate, iRedline has allowed us to effectively track changes within documents internally and still clearly communicate with anyone externally using Word. For a small cost, iRedline gives us the tools we need to be more efficient using Word's “Track Changes” and “Compare Documents” features. iRedline has the look and feel of Microsoft Word, which was something that we touted to our users. Built using Enhanced Native Architecture, iRedline brings hard-to-find features of “Track Changes” and “Compare Documents” to the forefront, provides shortcuts to frequently used features, fixes broken features and provides important features missing from native Word.
In November 2008, Esquire released two new versions of iCreate and iRedline. The new version of iCreate offers a multitude of new beneficial features, including:
The new version of iRedline offers new features, including:
While we are very happy with our current products, we do plan to review any and all new products that come onto the market and evaluate them as to whether they can improve our environment. In the near future I expect that we will continue to use Esquire's products and re-evaluate the needs for upgrades as time goes on.
With practice groups in business/corporate, real estate, business litigation, intellectual property and private client legal services, Boston-based
The firm's clients are in various industries from traditional New England manufacturing and service businesses, high-technology and life sciences companies and emerging companies to scientists and entrepreneurs as well as Canadian, Chinese and Israeli-based companies.
After several years using a very vanilla version of Office 97, we decided that we needed to do a complete network upgrade. As a large firm, we were continually struggling with document stability and maintaining a consistent look with the documents we created.
The marketing department created guidelines for our staff to try and maintain a consistency with our documents, but we had no way of effectively making these guidelines easy for people to follow. Staff members were using the “Save As” function from old documents to make things easier, but eventually documents were becoming corrupt as users passed along corruption from one document to another. In addition, we did not use any styles when creating documents and time management became an issue.
As part of the network upgrade, it was very clear that we needed a macro/template package to assist us in both creating a consistent branding and in creating stable, functional documents. The network upgrade also included moving from a Novell/Groupwise environment to a Windows/Outlook one and upgrading all of our desktop machines.
Undertaking such a large upgrade, we knew we were going to be bombarding the users with so many new applications that we wanted to make the transition as easy and as similar to Word (a core application) as possible ' to retain as much “comfort” as we could.
After gathering a list of possible products/vendors, including Esquire Innovations, Legal MacPac, Softwise/Innova and DeltaView, we went through an extensive period of demos and testing. We had each vendor show us its product and selected several to run in our test environment. We also conducted in-depth conversations with other legal IT professionals to get their candid views on the products.
While there are many products out there, we found that Esquire Innovations' iCreate and iRedline products were the best fit for our firm. The two products blend seamlessly with
Implementation
We set up a timeline for the entire upgrade and Esquire representatives came out to our headquarters in Boston to help us customize our templates and toolbars, as well as train our IT department on how to maintain the system going forward. The products were installed on every computer and each user participated in an initial training session.
The roll out of iCreate and iRedline went seamlessly. The tie in to native Word made the learning curve for the end users just as easy as it was for the IT department.
Most of the administration of iCreate and iRedline is done by me or our trainer. The products have been fairly easy to customize to our needs and also to deploy any changes to the end users.
Since installing and implementing iCreate and iRedline, we have upgraded our version with only minimal calls to Esquire for support. The upgrade was a much less daunting experience for us due to the product's ease of use and customer support from Esquire.
Staff members have reacted extremely positively to iCreate and iRedline. This is definitely not something that happened overnight, but as people see the time savings of creating and formatting a document right the first time, they have become advocates.
Key Benefits/Results
iCreate offers enormous capabilities for quickly creating, editing and standardizing legal documents, a problem that had been plaguing our law firm for many years. The product enabled us to stop users from using the “Save As” function for documents, especially primary documents like letters, memos and faxes. As a result we have had a large decline in the number of corrupted documents.
iCreate's “answer screen” has allowed users to input information, tie into “Contacts,” and maintain a certain degree of flexibility in terms of writing style all the while keeping a firm grip on marketing standards. The templates also allow us to embed firm styles and numbering into documents while still enabling users to change them as necessary. It has taken any fear over the use of styles out of the equation.
With a similar interface to iCreate, iRedline has allowed us to effectively track changes within documents internally and still clearly communicate with anyone externally using Word. For a small cost, iRedline gives us the tools we need to be more efficient using Word's “Track Changes” and “Compare Documents” features. iRedline has the look and feel of
In November 2008, Esquire released two new versions of iCreate and iRedline. The new version of iCreate offers a multitude of new beneficial features, including:
The new version of iRedline offers new features, including:
While we are very happy with our current products, we do plan to review any and all new products that come onto the market and evaluate them as to whether they can improve our environment. In the near future I expect that we will continue to use Esquire's products and re-evaluate the needs for upgrades as time goes on.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?