Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Unseemly Web of Keyword Advertising

By Jonathan Moskin

Despite the surface simplicity of keyword advertising disputes (typically entailing unwanted use of the exact trademark of a direct competitor promoting competing goods or services) the web the courts have spun addressing such Web-based advertising has been anything but. Fortunately, the Second Circuit's April 3 decision in Rescuecom Corp. v. Google, Inc., 562 F.3d 123 (2d Cir. 2009) (on the one-year anniversary of oral argument), straightens at least some of the tangled seams by recognizing that keyword ads tied to a trademark do constitute a use in commerce of the subject mark. The Second Circuit thus agreed with arguments made by this author in numerous articles (including Virtual Trademark Use ' The Parallel World of Keyword Ads, 98 Trademark Rptr. 873 (May-June 2008)) that New York district courts, in a cluster of cases recognizing no such “use in commerce,” had mistakenly focused on the statutory definition of how an owner acquires bona fide rights in a mark in the first instance, rather than the statutory test of infringement. The previous week, a Massachusetts decision adopted much the same analysis. Hearts on Fire Co. v. Blue Nile, Inc., 2009 WL 794482 (D. Mass. March 27, 2009).

In rejecting the broad conceptual rule precluding liability for lack of use in commerce, the Second Circuit simply remanded without assessing substantive liability. It thus remains to be seen whether or to what extent the New York courts may now adopt any of the equally broad conceptual rules embraced by various other courts supporting findings of liability, including the theory of “initial interest confusion” or a pared down “Internet-only” version of the traditional test of infringement, under which keyword ads might well be deemed per se infringements of the marks to which they are keyed. See e.g., Storus Corp. v. Aroa Marketing, Inc., No. C-06-2454 (MMC), 2008 WL 449835 (N.D. Cal. Feb. 15, 2008) (discussed below).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

Judge Rules Shaquille O'Neal Will Face Securities Lawsuit for Promotion, Sale of NFTs Image

A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.

Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Blockchain Domains: New Developments for Brand Owners Image

Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.

Coverage Issues Stemming from Dry Cleaner Contamination Suits Image

In recent years, there has been a growing number of dry cleaners claiming to be "organic," "green," or "eco-friendly." While that may be true with respect to some, many dry cleaners continue to use a cleaning method involving the use of a solvent called perchloroethylene, commonly known as perc. And, there seems to be an increasing number of lawsuits stemming from environmental problems associated with historic dry cleaning operations utilizing this chemical.