Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For companies that provide products made overseas to consumers in the United States, the years 2007 and 2008 may come to be remembered as watershed years. Those two years were plagued by an unfortunate series of high-profile safety recalls that involved products made overseas, namely in China. Seemingly one after another, recalls announced by the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and the Consumer Products Safety Commission (“CPSC”) had American consumers checking the food that their pets ate, the toys that their children played with and the medicine that their doctors prescribed.
The recalls were unsettling in both scope and detail. They included:
The negative publicity and concern generated by the 2007 and 2008 recalls described above have since ushered in increased government oversight of products made overseas, as well as sweeping legislation aimed at protecting consumers. This article discusses recent federal government action in response to the recalls and related emerging issues of which international manufacturers, importers and the attorneys who advise them should be aware.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.