Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For the most part, legal marketing executives possess tremendous interviewing prowess. Most are able to present their career stories in an attractive, cogent manner. Writing skills honed while developing marketing collateral; brochures, advertisements, press releases, proposals and presentations easily transfer into effective resume writing. Similarly, presentation skills are refined and come through during interviews. As a lot, marketing executives are typically well-prepared for interviews, having done their homework, often asking thought-provoking and insightful questions, and generally, having very likable dispositions. As such, many have the innate ability to take control of the interview ' skillfully influencing the topic of discussion and cadence of the session.
Despite their interviewing success historically, candidates for legal marketing positions are more likely to be facing a higher level of scrutiny on multiple fronts that could easily trip up an otherwise strong interviewer's performance. The line of questions too may be very different from what they are used to. Law firms are assessing more carefully prospective leaders across all management fronts, but especially in marketing.
New Expectations for the CMO Role
Chief Marketing Officers have expanded responsibilities and can now share the stage with or manage new chiefs. Chief Business Development Officer, Chief Strategy Officer, and Chief Practice Officer are new titular terms (or new positions) sprouting up in many firms' senior management structure. Business development, strategy, and practice development can either be congruent with or carved out from the responsibilities of the CMO. Organizations are becoming more complex in a matrix reporting structure geared to serving an increasingly dynamic marketplace. One's ability to perform in such an environment is going to be tested early, so interviewers now seek to solicit an understanding of those capabilities among candidates for a particular position.
Beyond the Cursory
Reacting to their own mixed results in hiring talent into top legal marketing positions, law firms are certainly looking for better outcomes. The high turnover rate of senior legal marketing executives is well known in the industry. In a recent Korn/Ferry survey of The Global 250, overwhelmingly, respondents suggested they would be placing higher scrutiny and seeking a greater measurement of “ROI” from their management teams. Marketing ranked second in level of importance for firms in a side-by-side comparison of management functions. Getting the hiring decision right is crucial to achieving the lofty goals and meeting the heightened expectations for the marketing function.
Shifting Focus
Law firms started evolving their marketing model long before the present economic crises besieged the industry. Many firms had evolved the function beyond the traditional “mar-com” operation to a stronger focus on business development. This initially seemed to correlate with the development of much stronger practice group management structures where business development managers (BDMs) embedded in the practices carved out more aggressive “go-to-market” strategies and key account management programs. Those BDMs not only made a huge impact on the success of the practices they supported, they also influenced the relationship dynamic between attorneys and marketing executives across the enterprise. With it, more one-on-one business development coaching is in demand and an expectation that BD skills can be “taught” to attorneys. The role of teacher is a significant development in the law firm marketing purview. The ability to teach/coach attorneys has crept into almost every CMO position description in the legal industry. Given the enhanced functionality of the CMO role, it makes sense that the way interviews are conducted with marketing executives is changing.
Behavioral Interviewing
Competency-based interviewing that allows for interviewers to measure behavioral tendencies ' so-called psychometric evaluation ' has been around for many years. It has been used successfully in many industries, but has not moved into the legal industry with the same alacrity. That is changing. The ability to measure and gauge “fit” with a firm's culture and values is now viewed to be as important as professional and academic credentials.
Lawyers have become better discerners of marketing talent moving away from being easily enamored with the ideas generated by creative executives to probing for more
demonstrable results during the interview process. There had been a tendency to buy the packaging and not unwrap it. That is not to suggest that marketing executives were paper tigers (although some are, I'm afraid), but instead to point out that the way these executives present during an interview, may be dramatically different from their actual managerial, learning, and thinking styles ' especially when they are behind “closed doors.”
If you have not experienced this type of interviewing, it would be helpful to familiarize yourself with the model. While many human capital consulting firms have written professional guides on the topic, I found several helpful Web sites that give examples of often used questions through a simple search engine query. Many university career services and advancement offices preparing their students and recent graduates on what to expect will list specific questions on their Web sites.
Ultimately, these questions are all scenario-based, where the interviewer probes for an executive's behavior tendencies. Their utility in the interviewing and assessing of more senior executives is now more commonplace. The questions can be tough and often unsettling for the otherwise confident and prepared candidate. “Tell me about a time when someone helped you become more politically aware and sensitive to a firm's culture” or “Tell me about a time when you managed a reorganization” are but two examples of questions which probe for leadership characteristics.
Business Acumen
Pressed by shrinking profit margins, firms will need strong financial leadership from their marketing executives. The scope of responsibilities of marketing organization may be expanding, but budgets and headcounts have been on a roller-coaster ride for months. Over the last five years, most marketing organizations have easily doubled and trebled in size, pushing some leaders of these organizations to manage people, processes, and budgets beyond their comfort zones. Building scaleable and sustainable models is admittedly difficult through wide market fluctuations. Interviewers will probe for a better understanding of ones ability to manage an organization in an effective manner. Ideas and creativity ' long hallmarks of the most exceptional marketing minds in any industry ' are giving way to managerial skills. Finance, HR, and operational know-how will be assessed alongside marketing prowess.
Conclusion
The changes in the legal marketing function have begun to influence the interviewing process. Behavioral competency is occupying a more prominent position in the marketing interview. Knowing your audience is a fundamental aspect of marketing any product. In the case of interviewing, understanding the shifting evaluation criteria for selection is an essential tool for marketing executives in this new era.
Michael DeCosta, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is a Senior Client Partner with Korn/Ferry International, resident in its Stamford, CT, office. Michael is a member of the firm's professional services and legal specialty practices. He focuses on search assignments for management and IT consulting, accounting and law firms. He can be reached at 203-406-8770 or [email protected].
For the most part, legal marketing executives possess tremendous interviewing prowess. Most are able to present their career stories in an attractive, cogent manner. Writing skills honed while developing marketing collateral; brochures, advertisements, press releases, proposals and presentations easily transfer into effective resume writing. Similarly, presentation skills are refined and come through during interviews. As a lot, marketing executives are typically well-prepared for interviews, having done their homework, often asking thought-provoking and insightful questions, and generally, having very likable dispositions. As such, many have the innate ability to take control of the interview ' skillfully influencing the topic of discussion and cadence of the session.
Despite their interviewing success historically, candidates for legal marketing positions are more likely to be facing a higher level of scrutiny on multiple fronts that could easily trip up an otherwise strong interviewer's performance. The line of questions too may be very different from what they are used to. Law firms are assessing more carefully prospective leaders across all management fronts, but especially in marketing.
New Expectations for the CMO Role
Chief Marketing Officers have expanded responsibilities and can now share the stage with or manage new chiefs. Chief Business Development Officer, Chief Strategy Officer, and Chief Practice Officer are new titular terms (or new positions) sprouting up in many firms' senior management structure. Business development, strategy, and practice development can either be congruent with or carved out from the responsibilities of the CMO. Organizations are becoming more complex in a matrix reporting structure geared to serving an increasingly dynamic marketplace. One's ability to perform in such an environment is going to be tested early, so interviewers now seek to solicit an understanding of those capabilities among candidates for a particular position.
Beyond the Cursory
Reacting to their own mixed results in hiring talent into top legal marketing positions, law firms are certainly looking for better outcomes. The high turnover rate of senior legal marketing executives is well known in the industry. In a recent Korn/Ferry survey of The Global 250, overwhelmingly, respondents suggested they would be placing higher scrutiny and seeking a greater measurement of “ROI” from their management teams. Marketing ranked second in level of importance for firms in a side-by-side comparison of management functions. Getting the hiring decision right is crucial to achieving the lofty goals and meeting the heightened expectations for the marketing function.
Shifting Focus
Law firms started evolving their marketing model long before the present economic crises besieged the industry. Many firms had evolved the function beyond the traditional “mar-com” operation to a stronger focus on business development. This initially seemed to correlate with the development of much stronger practice group management structures where business development managers (BDMs) embedded in the practices carved out more aggressive “go-to-market” strategies and key account management programs. Those BDMs not only made a huge impact on the success of the practices they supported, they also influenced the relationship dynamic between attorneys and marketing executives across the enterprise. With it, more one-on-one business development coaching is in demand and an expectation that BD skills can be “taught” to attorneys. The role of teacher is a significant development in the law firm marketing purview. The ability to teach/coach attorneys has crept into almost every CMO position description in the legal industry. Given the enhanced functionality of the CMO role, it makes sense that the way interviews are conducted with marketing executives is changing.
Behavioral Interviewing
Competency-based interviewing that allows for interviewers to measure behavioral tendencies ' so-called psychometric evaluation ' has been around for many years. It has been used successfully in many industries, but has not moved into the legal industry with the same alacrity. That is changing. The ability to measure and gauge “fit” with a firm's culture and values is now viewed to be as important as professional and academic credentials.
Lawyers have become better discerners of marketing talent moving away from being easily enamored with the ideas generated by creative executives to probing for more
demonstrable results during the interview process. There had been a tendency to buy the packaging and not unwrap it. That is not to suggest that marketing executives were paper tigers (although some are, I'm afraid), but instead to point out that the way these executives present during an interview, may be dramatically different from their actual managerial, learning, and thinking styles ' especially when they are behind “closed doors.”
If you have not experienced this type of interviewing, it would be helpful to familiarize yourself with the model. While many human capital consulting firms have written professional guides on the topic, I found several helpful Web sites that give examples of often used questions through a simple search engine query. Many university career services and advancement offices preparing their students and recent graduates on what to expect will list specific questions on their Web sites.
Ultimately, these questions are all scenario-based, where the interviewer probes for an executive's behavior tendencies. Their utility in the interviewing and assessing of more senior executives is now more commonplace. The questions can be tough and often unsettling for the otherwise confident and prepared candidate. “Tell me about a time when someone helped you become more politically aware and sensitive to a firm's culture” or “Tell me about a time when you managed a reorganization” are but two examples of questions which probe for leadership characteristics.
Business Acumen
Pressed by shrinking profit margins, firms will need strong financial leadership from their marketing executives. The scope of responsibilities of marketing organization may be expanding, but budgets and headcounts have been on a roller-coaster ride for months. Over the last five years, most marketing organizations have easily doubled and trebled in size, pushing some leaders of these organizations to manage people, processes, and budgets beyond their comfort zones. Building scaleable and sustainable models is admittedly difficult through wide market fluctuations. Interviewers will probe for a better understanding of ones ability to manage an organization in an effective manner. Ideas and creativity ' long hallmarks of the most exceptional marketing minds in any industry ' are giving way to managerial skills. Finance, HR, and operational know-how will be assessed alongside marketing prowess.
Conclusion
The changes in the legal marketing function have begun to influence the interviewing process. Behavioral competency is occupying a more prominent position in the marketing interview. Knowing your audience is a fundamental aspect of marketing any product. In the case of interviewing, understanding the shifting evaluation criteria for selection is an essential tool for marketing executives in this new era.
Michael DeCosta, a member of this newsletter's Board of Editors, is a Senior Client Partner with
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.