Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Contemporary family law practice abounds with allegations of dissipation and misappropriation of marital assets. Over a generation ago, few contested divorce actions involved claims of economic misconduct. As the current recession deepens, these claims are not only on the rise, but they appear to be the rule in many cases. Indeed, the tool box of the modern family lawyer is brimming with instruments designed primarily to prevent a spouse from intentionally, fraudulently or recklessly liquidating, transferring, alienating or encumbering marital assets. In addition to granting injunctions and other forms of special relief, family courts are increasingly joining third parties as additional defendants, issuing attachment proceedings, and in some of the more egregious cases, imposing constructive trusts.
These tools, however, are used to prevent or enjoin dissipation that occurs after the parties have already separated. Today, however, family lawyers are confronting issues involving pre-separation dissipation, even though many divorce statutes contain little or no guidance on whether assets dissipated or misappropriated prior to separation can be “added-back” into the marital estate for distribution purposes. This is not to say that these statutes are silent generally on the issue of dissipation. To the contrary, in dividing the marital estate, many state laws look to the contribution or dissipation of each party in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation or appreciation of the property subject to division. Pre-separation dissipation is a relatively new concept, which argues for the inclusion of the dissipated asset into the martial estate, even though the dissipation took place during the marriage and prior to the date of separation or the commencement of the action. Put another way, if a spouse deliberately or recklessly dissipates marital assets either in contemplation of divorce or during a period when the marriage is in serious jeopardy, can the spouse guilty of economic misconduct be charged with those dissipated assets at the time of equitable distribution or community property division?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
A federal district court in Miami, FL, has ruled that former National Basketball Association star Shaquille O'Neal will have to face a lawsuit over his promotion of unregistered securities in the form of cryptocurrency tokens and that he was a "seller" of these unregistered securities.
Blockchain domain names offer decentralized alternatives to traditional DNS-based domain names, promising enhanced security, privacy and censorship resistance. However, these benefits come with significant challenges, particularly for brand owners seeking to protect their trademarks in these new digital spaces.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.