Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Contemporary family law practice abounds with allegations of dissipation and misappropriation of marital assets. Over a generation ago, few contested divorce actions involved claims of economic misconduct. As the current recession deepens, these claims are not only on the rise, but they appear to be the rule in many cases. Indeed, the tool box of the modern family lawyer is brimming with instruments designed primarily to prevent a spouse from intentionally, fraudulently or recklessly liquidating, transferring, alienating or encumbering marital assets. In addition to granting injunctions and other forms of special relief, family courts are increasingly joining third parties as additional defendants, issuing attachment proceedings, and in some of the more egregious cases, imposing constructive trusts.
These tools, however, are used to prevent or enjoin dissipation that occurs after the parties have already separated. Today, however, family lawyers are confronting issues involving pre-separation dissipation, even though many divorce statutes contain little or no guidance on whether assets dissipated or misappropriated prior to separation can be “added-back” into the marital estate for distribution purposes. This is not to say that these statutes are silent generally on the issue of dissipation. To the contrary, in dividing the marital estate, many state laws look to the contribution or dissipation of each party in the acquisition, preservation, depreciation or appreciation of the property subject to division. Pre-separation dissipation is a relatively new concept, which argues for the inclusion of the dissipated asset into the martial estate, even though the dissipation took place during the marriage and prior to the date of separation or the commencement of the action. Put another way, if a spouse deliberately or recklessly dissipates marital assets either in contemplation of divorce or during a period when the marriage is in serious jeopardy, can the spouse guilty of economic misconduct be charged with those dissipated assets at the time of equitable distribution or community property division?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.