Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Coverage for Spoliation Claims
“Insufficient evidence,” Justice Benjamin N. Cardozo famously noted, “is, in the eye of the law, no evidence.” People v. Galbo, 112 N.E. 1041 (N.Y. 1916). Indeed, given that evidence is the very foundation upon which all cases are built, the preservation of evidence, or anything that may potentially become evidence, is of the highest concern in any current or prospective case. To that end, numerous remedies exist to cure or punish ' depending on your point of view ' the loss, alteration, or destruction of evidence, i.e., spoliation of evidence. For example, by far the most common and well-known of these remedies is the spoliation inference; a civil remedy that allows the fact-finder “to presume that the evidence the spoliator destroyed or otherwise concealed would have been unfavorable to him or her.” Rosenblitt v. Zimmerman, 766 A.2d 749 (N.J. 2001); see also Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(i). In fact, the very term “spoliation” is derived from the legal maxim describing the spoliation inference, “omnia praesumuntur contra spoliatorem,” or “all presumptions are against one who wrongfully dispossesses another (a despoiler).” Black's Law Dictionary 1671 (7th Ed. 1999).
Other remedies have also developed over the years. For example, a court may impose sanctions on a party for failure to make disclosures in discovery ' including, in some rare cases, the entry of a default judgment in favor of the non-spoliating party. See, e.g., Keene v. Brigham and Women's Hosp., Inc., 786 N.E.2d 824 (Mass. 2003). In addition, counsel inculpated in spoliation may face ethical or malpractice allegations. See Model Rules of Professional Conduct 3.4 (2009). Moreover, a great many states have gone so far as to make spoliation of evidence a criminal offense, although such laws are rarely enforced. See, e.g., West's Ann. Cal. Penal Code ' 135 (1999) (California: misdemeanor); 720 ILCS 5/31-4 (1998) (Illinois: class 4 felony); McKinney's Penal Law ' 215.40 (1998) (New York: class E felony).
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
A Lawyer's System for Active Reading
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.