Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement/Parody Defense
Fredrik Colting's new novel 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye (written as John David California) includes J.D. Salinger, author of the classic novel The Catcher in the Rye, as a character. In finding Colting's work wasn't a fair use parody of Catcher in the Rye, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York noted in part: “Defendants' use of Salinger as a character, in order to criticize his reclusive nature and alleged desire to exercise 'iron-clad control over his intellectual property, refusing to allow others to adapt any of his characters or stories in other media,' ' is at most, a tool with which to criticize and comment upon the author, J.D. Salinger, and his supposed idiosyncracies. It does not, however, direct that criticism toward Catcher and [the Salinger novel's central character Holden] Caulfield themselves, and thus is not an example of parody.” Salinger v. Colting, 09 Civ. 5095(DAB). As for Colting's rendering of an elder Holden Caulfield, the Southern District of New York emphasized that “it can be argued that the contrast between Holden's authentic but critical and rebellious nature and his tendency toward depressive alienation is one of the key themes of Catcher. That many readers and critics have apparently idolized Caulfield for the former, despite ' or perhaps because of ' the latter, does not change the fact that those elements were already apparent in Catcher. ' It is hardly parodic to repeat that same exercise in contrast, just because society and the characters have aged.”
Film Production Insurance/Green-Light Endorsement
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.