Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright Infringement/Parody Defense
Fredrik Colting's new novel 60 Years Later: Coming Through the Rye (written as John David California) includes J.D. Salinger, author of the classic novel The Catcher in the Rye, as a character. In finding Colting's work wasn't a fair use parody of Catcher in the Rye, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York noted in part: “Defendants' use of Salinger as a character, in order to criticize his reclusive nature and alleged desire to exercise 'iron-clad control over his intellectual property, refusing to allow others to adapt any of his characters or stories in other media,' ' is at most, a tool with which to criticize and comment upon the author, J.D. Salinger, and his supposed idiosyncracies. It does not, however, direct that criticism toward Catcher and [the Salinger novel's central character Holden] Caulfield themselves, and thus is not an example of parody.” Salinger v. Colting, 09 Civ. 5095(DAB). As for Colting's rendering of an elder Holden Caulfield, the Southern District of New York emphasized that “it can be argued that the contrast between Holden's authentic but critical and rebellious nature and his tendency toward depressive alienation is one of the key themes of Catcher. That many readers and critics have apparently idolized Caulfield for the former, despite ' or perhaps because of ' the latter, does not change the fact that those elements were already apparent in Catcher. ' It is hardly parodic to repeat that same exercise in contrast, just because society and the characters have aged.”
Film Production Insurance/Green-Light Endorsement
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.