Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Porter & Hedges is one of the last remaining mid-sized firms in Houston with 100 attorneys that regularly vies for business with much larger multi-office firms. To level the playing field as smoothly as possible, the firm embarked on a plan to improve its business development infrastructure. By shoring up technology, marketing and customer relationship management (“CRM”) foundations, Porter & Hedges would be more competitive in business development and competitive intelligence.
The first year of the quest was taken up with in-depth research, evaluation and analysis to exhaust possibilities and CRM solutions. Prospective consultants were charged with implementing a solid business development program, along with a new, first-time CRM solution that would elevate how the firm tapped the treasure trove of clients internally.
CRM Selection Criteria
With the support of firm leadership, marketing and IT together were required to critically and clearly understand how internal customers would use a CRM solution. Pre-purchase factors included discussions surrounding interface, ease of navigation, long-term utilization, scalability, and intuitive adoption. Other issues weighed heavily on the final decision:
After a thorough investigation, Porter & Hedges made a strategic decision in the fall of 2007 to deploy LexisNexis' InterAction' software.
Ramp Up
IT and marketing played a critical role in their compatibility and cohesiveness leading up to the first data dump. Every law firm investing in installing and deploying a sophisticated solution like InterAction must ensure these two teams are in synch. At Porter & Hedges, the IT department is the bona fide expert in InterAction; they know the system better than anyone firm wide, and marketing relies on them for their earned knowledge.
In advance of the first data deployment, marketing and IT can expect to devote a significant period of time for a minimum of two weeks preparing for launch. This effort can encompass anything from hardware and software synch, installation, communication, training, assigning roles and responsibilities, and more. Because the teams were congruent, we were able to keep the pace to an even keel and collaborate on everything needing completion. We relied heavily on the LexisNexis software consultants and our hired consultant to guide us on the “what next” of the process.
The premise behind marketing is to find the right software that works with the firm's personality and culture. The CRM system apple must pair with the attorney apples. Then, the issue becomes how best to implement the system in an efficient and expedient fashion. That process includes the early identification of attorneys' concerns about data confidentiality and relationship ownership. One way to mitigate the potential issues is to ensure that senior leadership is on board with strong support of the CRM solution.
Data Dump
“Dirty” data living in Outlook business contacts needed to be cleansed prior to populating InterAction. A joint team of six from marketing and IT cohesively and meticulously combed every record prior to the first data dump into InterAction. Each entry was reviewed, mapped, cleansed, categorized, de-duped, and deleted if too old. Attorneys helped on the front end to tag entries as confidential, personal or open. This process, while labor intensive, is necessary at the outset to ensure the cleanest percentage of overall data. Data were gleaned from elsewhere in the firm's files, such as spreadsheets used for previous firm-sponsored events.
While preparing for installation of the CRM solution, the firm was also in the process of developing a business continuity plan. Data and server security, and hard drive and workstation back-up planning were being initiated in the event that business continuity was disrupted (such as during Hurricane Ike in the fall of 2008). The teams dovetailed on both timelines to enhance business infrastructure and perfect technology for future data security.
Training
Since deployment in late 2007, there are nearly 60,000 company name entries in InterAction along with hundreds of thousands of personal contacts. The data are continually cleaned. Marketing and IT are confident the database functions at a high percentage clean-data capacity; however, it is a continuous cycle to keep entries accurate.
Firm-wide training began with a core team trained in all aspects of InterAction. The core team trained second-tier trainers within the firm during Friday “lunch 'n learns.” The trainers were then responsible for conducting desk-side trainings and posting weekly tips on the firm's Intranet.
Display ads were hung on bathroom doors asking “Is Your Data Clean?” Secretaries attended a series of training sessions, and weekly sessions remain available for those who never attended before or need a refresher. Beginning in 2009, all new associates are required to attend mandatory training, and their use of the CRM system is also part of their indoctrination into the firm.
In May 2008, a mass invitation was mailed to the firm's mailing list of 7,600, and just over 10% were returned undeliverable. As more mailings occur and more data are mined for errors, the firm expects fewer undelivered pieces. A recent CLE announcement mailed in
early 2009 garnered a 90% accuracy rating.
Some Benefits
Here is a summary of some of the benefits Porter & Hedges gained by using InterAction.
Some practice areas within the firm are realizing the fruits of labor and reaping benefit from InterAction.
As social media continues to be prevalent in law firm marketing and business development, Porter & Hedges will consider turning on LinkedIn' via InterAction. Users can conveniently access LinkedIn profiles from within the InterAction application window. When a contact in our database is accessed, that person's LinkedIn profile pops up with scores of his or her contacts from respective LinkedIn networks. This multiple-tier connectivity presents thought-provoking business- and client-development opportunities firm wide.
The scalability of InterAction is truly a feature worth mention. IT departments know their users and companies can grow into the features and modules InterAction brings. For firms still on the cusp of purchasing CRM software, the recently announced InterAction onDemand Software as a Service (“SaaS”) is the first first Web-accessible CRM solution for mid-market law firms. This SaaS offering streamlines a leading global CRM solution into a lower-cost, more-simplified application for firms with fewer than 250 attorneys.
As they say, the proof is in the pudding. Looking back over the past several years when our firm's business development technology infrastructure had very little in place to today when the value of InterAction is becoming more defined, Porter & Hedges is on its way to realizing ROI beyond earlier comprehension. We strive to share our results with firm leadership that include better productivity, work efficiency, relationship management, enhanced business development and lead generation.
There's one thing for sure, the investment we have made in InterAction has put us on a path to capitalize on a wealth of existing information, and it is key to Porter & Hedges' overall business development strategy.
The first year of the quest was taken up with in-depth research, evaluation and analysis to exhaust possibilities and CRM solutions. Prospective consultants were charged with implementing a solid business development program, along with a new, first-time CRM solution that would elevate how the firm tapped the treasure trove of clients internally.
CRM Selection Criteria
With the support of firm leadership, marketing and IT together were required to critically and clearly understand how internal customers would use a CRM solution. Pre-purchase factors included discussions surrounding interface, ease of navigation, long-term utilization, scalability, and intuitive adoption. Other issues weighed heavily on the final decision:
After a thorough investigation,
Ramp Up
IT and marketing played a critical role in their compatibility and cohesiveness leading up to the first data dump. Every law firm investing in installing and deploying a sophisticated solution like InterAction must ensure these two teams are in synch. At
In advance of the first data deployment, marketing and IT can expect to devote a significant period of time for a minimum of two weeks preparing for launch. This effort can encompass anything from hardware and software synch, installation, communication, training, assigning roles and responsibilities, and more. Because the teams were congruent, we were able to keep the pace to an even keel and collaborate on everything needing completion. We relied heavily on the
The premise behind marketing is to find the right software that works with the firm's personality and culture. The CRM system apple must pair with the attorney apples. Then, the issue becomes how best to implement the system in an efficient and expedient fashion. That process includes the early identification of attorneys' concerns about data confidentiality and relationship ownership. One way to mitigate the potential issues is to ensure that senior leadership is on board with strong support of the CRM solution.
Data Dump
“Dirty” data living in Outlook business contacts needed to be cleansed prior to populating InterAction. A joint team of six from marketing and IT cohesively and meticulously combed every record prior to the first data dump into InterAction. Each entry was reviewed, mapped, cleansed, categorized, de-duped, and deleted if too old. Attorneys helped on the front end to tag entries as confidential, personal or open. This process, while labor intensive, is necessary at the outset to ensure the cleanest percentage of overall data. Data were gleaned from elsewhere in the firm's files, such as spreadsheets used for previous firm-sponsored events.
While preparing for installation of the CRM solution, the firm was also in the process of developing a business continuity plan. Data and server security, and hard drive and workstation back-up planning were being initiated in the event that business continuity was disrupted (such as during Hurricane Ike in the fall of 2008). The teams dovetailed on both timelines to enhance business infrastructure and perfect technology for future data security.
Training
Since deployment in late 2007, there are nearly 60,000 company name entries in InterAction along with hundreds of thousands of personal contacts. The data are continually cleaned. Marketing and IT are confident the database functions at a high percentage clean-data capacity; however, it is a continuous cycle to keep entries accurate.
Firm-wide training began with a core team trained in all aspects of InterAction. The core team trained second-tier trainers within the firm during Friday “lunch 'n learns.” The trainers were then responsible for conducting desk-side trainings and posting weekly tips on the firm's Intranet.
Display ads were hung on bathroom doors asking “Is Your Data Clean?” Secretaries attended a series of training sessions, and weekly sessions remain available for those who never attended before or need a refresher. Beginning in 2009, all new associates are required to attend mandatory training, and their use of the CRM system is also part of their indoctrination into the firm.
In May 2008, a mass invitation was mailed to the firm's mailing list of 7,600, and just over 10% were returned undeliverable. As more mailings occur and more data are mined for errors, the firm expects fewer undelivered pieces. A recent CLE announcement mailed in
early 2009 garnered a 90% accuracy rating.
Some Benefits
Here is a summary of some of the benefits
Some practice areas within the firm are realizing the fruits of labor and reaping benefit from InterAction.
As social media continues to be prevalent in law firm marketing and business development,
The scalability of InterAction is truly a feature worth mention. IT departments know their users and companies can grow into the features and modules InterAction brings. For firms still on the cusp of purchasing CRM software, the recently announced InterAction onDemand Software as a Service (“SaaS”) is the first first Web-accessible CRM solution for mid-market law firms. This SaaS offering streamlines a leading global CRM solution into a lower-cost, more-simplified application for firms with fewer than 250 attorneys.
As they say, the proof is in the pudding. Looking back over the past several years when our firm's business development technology infrastructure had very little in place to today when the value of InterAction is becoming more defined,
There's one thing for sure, the investment we have made in InterAction has put us on a path to capitalize on a wealth of existing information, and it is key to
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.