Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A federal judge recently concluded in a widely reported option backdating case that the California law firm Irell & Manella had “compromised ' important principles” involving the “fair administration of justice.” United States v. Nicholas, 606 F. Supp. 2d 1109, 1112 (C.D. Cal. 2009). After finding that the firm had improperly disclosed one client's confidences to benefit another firm client, the court said it could not “overlook Irell's ethical misconduct in this regard and must refer Irell to the State Bar for appropriate discipline.”
This case highlights the risks that all lawyers run when they do not properly identify their client. An attorney-client relationship triggers all the lawyer's ethical duties and defines who owns the attorney-client privilege itself. As with many other ethical pitfalls for attorneys, the risks are much higher in the murky world where clients face criminal jeopardy. The criminal process not only threatens a client's liberty but also adds a constitutional dimension to the protections afforded clients by state law and professional ethics.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.