Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A properly pleaded Complaint in a design defect case will permit the plaintiff to try his case on several different theories: negligence, strict liability and breach of warranty. Nevertheless, certain cases would be most efficiently tried only as a breach of warranty.
Trying a negligence case requires the jury to find that the defendant failed to act reasonably in designing the product. To make out a prima facie case of negligence for a design defect, the plaintiff must show there was a feasible design alternative that would have made the product safer. Product liability law evolved to provide a recovery for persons injured by defective products without the need of proving negligence. This, the courts thought, would lessen the plaintiff's burden at trial and shift the risks and costs from the injured party to the manufacturer. Despite the good intentions, however, over the past 20 or 30 years, courts have said that actions in strict liability for defective design are really negligence cases. Thus, what started out as an attempt to make manufacturers strictly liable for product design defects, ended up requiring the same proof as a claim in a negligence case.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
On Aug. 9, 2023, Gov. Kathy Hochul introduced New York's inaugural comprehensive cybersecurity strategy. In sum, the plan aims to update government networks, bolster county-level digital defenses, and regulate critical infrastructure.
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
Executives have access to some of the company's most sensitive information, and they're increasingly being targeted by hackers looking to steal company secrets or to perpetrate cybercrimes.