Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Product Liability Law & StrategyKickerFeaturesTopicsCommercial LawLitigationSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Preemption Paradox

By J. Christopher Allen, Jr.

For many Supreme Court observers, 2008 dawned with hope ' perhaps not HOPE on the order of Grant Park on election night, but hope nevertheless. Four separate preemption cases were among the ranks of the Court's docket. Collectively, they offered an opportunity for the Court to take a significant step toward providing much-needed clarity in connection with its preemption jurisprudence ' or so it seemed. Because Chief Justice Roberts recused himself, Warner-Lambert Co., LLC v. Kent resulted in a 4 to 4 (non)decision that produced no published opinion. 128 S. Ct. 1168 (2008). Oral argument in Wyeth v. Levine, Docket No. 06-1249, did not take place until Nov. 3, 2008, and the Court did not issue a decision until March 4 of this year. That left Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc., 128 S. Ct. 999 (2008) and Altria Group, Inc. v. Good, 129 S. Ct. 538 (2008). Both decisions assessed express preemption provisions and helped to fill voids created by highly fractured antecedent Supreme Court decisions ' Medtronic, Inc. v. Lohr, 518 U.S. 470 (1996) in the case of Riegel and Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc., 505 U.S. 504 (1992) in the case of Altria Group. However, Riegel and Altria Group are difficult to reconcile in fundamental ways, and, consequently, they did little to provide meaningful guidance to litigants and lower courts.

Riegel Finds Express Preemption Under the Medical Device Amendments

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Beach Boys Songs Written Decades Ago Triggered Current Quarrel With Lawyers Image

There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Transfer Tax Implications on Real Property Leases Image

The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.