Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Addressing the issue of whether a comprehensive reference listing of every relevant antisense oligodeoxynucleotide in a known nucleic acid sequence anticipates claims to specific antisense sequences, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that anticipation merely requires that the oligonucleotide sequence was in the prior art, not that its usefulness was previously disclosed. In re Gleave, Case No. 08-1453 (Fed. Cir., March 26, 2009) (Prost, J.).
Martin Gleave and Maxim Signaevsky (collectively “Gleave”) filed U.S. Patent Application No. 10/346,493. The examiner rejected claims 1, 4, 15 and 18-21 as anticipated or obvious under 35 U.S.C. ' 102(b)/103(a). Gleave appealed the prior art rejection to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, which upheld the rejection. Gleave next appealed to the Federal Circuit.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.