Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For employment attorneys and human resource professionals, the phrase “no good deed goes unpunished” applies all too often. The Supreme Court recently affirmed this adage in Ricci v. DeStefano, 129 S. Ct. 2658 (2009).
In Ricci, the city employer refused to certify the results of a promotional exam for its firefighters because of fear that doing so would result in disparate impact discrimination and liability. The African-American pass rate was half that of white test takers. The city received political pressure and threats of litigation if it certified the results. Consequently, the city decided not to promote anyone, including the white and hispanic employees who otherwise would have been promoted as a result of the exam. The employer argued it acted in good-faith compliance with Title VII. The Supreme Court recognized that the employer's objective was to avoid disparate impact discrimination (and liability), nevertheless, the Court concluded “whatever the city's ultimate aim ' however, well intentioned and benevolent it might have seemed ' the city made its employment decision because of race.” Id. at 2674.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
A trend analysis of the benefits and challenges of bringing back administrative, word processing and billing services to law offices.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
Summary Judgment Denied Defendant in Declaratory Action by Producer of To Kill a Mockingbird Broadway Play Seeking Amateur Theatrical Rights
“Baseball arbitration” refers to the process used in Major League Baseball in which if an eligible player's representative and the club ownership cannot reach a compensation agreement through negotiation, each party enters a final submission and during a formal hearing each side — player and management — presents its case and then the designated panel of arbitrators chooses one of the salary bids with no other result being allowed. This method has become increasingly popular even beyond the sport of baseball.
'Disconnect Between In-House and Outside Counsel is a continuation of the discussion of client expectations and the disconnect that often occurs. And although the outside attorneys should be pursuing how inside-counsel actually think, inside counsel should make an effort to impart this information without waiting to be asked.