Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Family Dollar Stores is a neighborhood-based convenience and value retailer with more than 6,600 locations in 44 states, and more than 45,000 full-time employees.
As the director of litigation support, I work with a team of 26 attorneys and various information technology (IT) professionals. I am the primary driver for all e-discovery, information life cycle management, privacy and litigation management processes. At any one time, Family Dollar has dozens of professionals collaborating on multiple pending cases in a variety of fields.
Communication Breakdown:
Cumbersome Legal Hold Process
We send out litigation holds almost daily to up to 400 custodians at a time, including anyone from store managers to senior organization officers. e-Mail is the most commonly targeted type of data in our holds, but we also often place holds on a wide variety of other data, including unstructured file network-situated data and structured data; and we decide what to hold based on the nature of each case.
In developing our litigation hold process, we had created a manual approach to the large number of litigation holds we managed. However, we found the process to be very labor-intensive. When a triggering event came to our attention, we issued a hold notice via our corporate e-mail accounts and hard copy. We tracked the details of each legal hold, including reminders and hold releases, using Excel spreadsheets.
We found this process to be lacking, and determined we needed a “one-stop” communication link with custodians, with automated audit trails. We also wanted to move away from the practice of regularly using outside counsel to handle the creation of custom legal hold notices for our litigation portfolio. We knew it was time to rethink our legal hold process.
Finding the Right Solution
We decided that automating our legal hold process was the best way we could give good service to the business people with whom we work while also mitigating risk for the organization and reducing the time spent on the legal hold process.
We came up with several requirements going into our search for an automated solution. First, we needed it to capture and create audit trails of all hold activity. Second, we needed a solution that would provide a centralized way to manage legal hold responses and answer custodian and data stewards' questions. Third, it needed to be intuitive and easy to use without specialized training. Finally, it needed to be cost-effective.
I began my search by looking at automated legal hold solutions from several leading legal software providers. While many offered several features we needed, an in-depth analysis of Exterro's Fusion Legal Hold revealed it to be the best fit for Family Dollar's needs.
Exterro's Fusion Legal Hold met all of our requirements, and offered several additional features that made our decision an easy one:
Implementing Fusion
The implementation process went extremely smoothly. We chose to keep Fusion Legal Hold behind Exterro's firewall, allowing us to forego on-site installation; and implementing the ASP model was a simple, easy process. Exterro had a solid implementation plan before rollout, and we were quickly able to leverage its integration capabilities to incorporate our pre-existing technology with Fusion. Our transition was seamless and there was neither significant interruption in our day-to-day activities nor any system compatibility issues. I worked with our IT department and Exterro's client success and engineering teams to deploy Fusion Legal Hold and its features:
Getting buy-in from our constituents was fairly easy. I sat with each attorney and paralegal while they created their first legal hold, and overall it took about two weeks to get everyone comfortable with the new technology and associated process. One of my most difficult-to-please paralegals even walked into my office and said, “I love this thing.” Overall, we had a very positive response from the legal team as well as the custodians and IT team members.
End Results
With Fusion in place, once a triggering event comes to our attention, a member of the legal team can immediately create a legal hold by choosing the template appropriate to matter type and modifying it as necessary, or creating a new hold using Fusion's simple three-step wizard. The hold is then approved and sent out rapidly via Fusion's messaging system, with built-in escalations and reminder parameters. Fusion tracks and audits all activities related to that hold, alerts the legal team when action is needed, and allows our custodians to ask questions and our attorneys to answer immediately. When the matter is resolved, the hold is released with the click of a mouse.
The aspects of the software that we have been most satisfied with are:
' Streamlined process, compliance. Fusion has cut the inefficiency out of the legal hold process, greatly improving our customer service and accessibility. Additionally, by allowing end users to review legal holds as part of their normal, day-to-day business processes, Fusion has embedded compliance into everyday workflows.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.