Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
For many years, corporate counsel and other executive-level buyers of legal services have been alerting law firms to their growing concern over the gap between rising law firm fees and the value of services delivered. Despite mounting client frustration, the law firm value proposition in the legal industry has remained relatively unchanged, with most firms continuing to bill clients by the hour and raising rates annually. These trends largely supported paying associates' ever-increasing salaries and drove higher partner profits ' neither of which served to improve the value of services delivered to clients. Client concerns about rising fees and the “value” of services have been previously overshadowed by years of enormous demand for legal services, enabling firms to avoid undergoing significant change to the traditional service delivery model. However, over the past year, market dynamics have aligned, creating an opportunity to transform services provided by law firms in order to better meet or exceed client demands.
Legal services purchasing power has shifted to a highly sophisticated, business savvy, and now frustrated client group, heralding the possibility of groundbreaking changes in the way that law firms and their clients interact. Today, clients appear to be gaining ground in calling upon law firms to step-up and deliver “value.” Three demand-related factors are driving this market shift. First, corporate boards (and for private companies, CFOs and other executive leaders) recognize that legal costs far outweigh any other expense of the business, and are placing growing emphasis on reducing legal spend; second, increased competition is driving down costs; and third, technological advances now provide tools that enable improved service delivery. The buyer is well educated and readily expecting law firms to respond with efficient, high-quality, cost-effective services.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.