Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
It is without question that, over the last decade, securitization has played a pivotal role in the availability of credit to companies in the equipment leasing and finance sector. As investors shunned the structured product markets in 2008, liquidity disappeared and new ABS issuance dried up. This phenomenon was due to, among other things, re-pricing of risk, credit quality concerns related to the underlying exposures, questioned viability of originators/servicers, and the negative public perception (be it correct or incorrect) of any association with “structured” products. Finance companies became unable to access a traditionally inexpensive and ample source of funds which, in turn, constricted their ability not only to meet the capital needs of their existing customers, but also to grow their customer base. As a result, it became increasingly necessary for those companies to curtail financing activities and utilize other sources of available funding, such as working capital lines, revolving credit facilities, non-term securitization facilities and “one-off” partial or non-recourse transactions at a time when those same credit providers were under balance sheet pressures and seeking to reduce or eliminate exposures ' particularly to middle-market credits.
It is this disruption in the ultimate availability of liquidity to customers of specialty finance companies that the Federal Reserve sought to remedy with its announcement and subsequent implementation of the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility (“TALF” or the “Facility”) and the inclusion of certain equipment ABS as eligible collateral thereunder. Without doubt, the initial availability, through TALF, of quality levered returns with substantially limited downside has played a role in resuscitating the ABS market. Up to and including September 2009, more than 60 TALF-eligible transactions have come to market. Although these are certainly encouraging statistics, significant hurdles still remain for many equipment lessors seeking to access the term ABS markets. Although the investor base for the AAA classes of TALF-eligible ABS and ABS generally continues to expand from a handful of traditional buyers, such as large money managers and a number of bespoke TALF-specific investment funds, investor demand for subordinate tranches remains soft. As few prospective issuers in the equipment sector have been able to achieve the required AAA rating on their senior bonds, the term ABS market remains effectively closed to all but a handful of these issuers.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.