Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., Inc., 525 U.S. 55 (1998) is widely recognized as a milestone in the annals of patent law for providing direction as to how courts are to analyze and apply the statutory “on-sale” bar to the granting of patents. See 35 USC ' 102(b) (“a person shall be entitled to a patent unless ' (b) the invention was ' on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States”). Prior to Pfaff, courts used the “totality of the circumstances” test in determining whether an invention was on sale under ' 102(b). This open-ended standard provided little guidance, however, with the result that courts did not apply the test uniformly. Thus, for example, while some courts held that an invention could not be on sale under ' 102(b) unless the invention had been “reduced to practice,” others did not. Pfaff provided a much needed, clear, and uniform test for lower courts to apply. This article explores how the Federal Circuit has applied Pfaff in more recent cases.
Pfaff
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.