Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Manufacturers of children's products ' toys, clothing, furniture and virtually everything else a child might use ' breathed a collective sigh of relief several months ago when the U. S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) stayed for one year significant testing and certification aspects of implementation of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) shortly before it was to take effect.
Often regarded as a response to scandals about tainted edibles and toys originating in Asia, the CPSIA would have imposed costly burdens on manufacturers of children's products to test and to certify that their products met new total lead limits (300 parts per million [ppm], dropped from 600 ppm, as of Aug. 14, 2009), phthalate limits for certain products (1000 ppm), and mandatory toy standards. This temporary stay, however, does not absolve manufacturers and importers from the responsibility of ensuring that their products do not violate these limits. Any product in excess of these limits is banned from sale, and continuing to sell products in excess of these limits can result in substantial penalties under the CPSIA. Also, unbeknownst perhaps to many manufacturers, some old (Cal. Health & Safety Code, sec 25349.5'25249.17 [commonly known as "Proposition 65"]) and some new (Assembly Bill 1108, Cal. Health & Safety Code, sec 108935'108939 ["AB 1108"]) California legislation already imposes significant regulation on the content of lead, phthalates and hundreds of other putative toxins in many of these same children's products if they are manufactured and/or distributed in California.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.