Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As litigators and advocates for physician clients facing medical malpractice claims, as well as attorneys who often counsel and advise physician-based medical practices on the “best practices” to invoke in order to avoid becoming a defendant in a medical malpractice suit, it is important that we help our clients to understand the duties they owe their patients. These duties go beyond diagnosing medical conditions and prescribing proper treatments. One such duty, the parameters of which continue to evolve and become more refined ' and perhaps more confusing ' through litigation, is the duty to facilitate the patient's informed consent.
The duty of eliciting informed consent, in its most basic form, is the duty inherent in the patient-physician relationship to properly and fully advise a patient of the risks associated with a particular procedure. With this information, the patient can decide what course of treatment is best for him or her. In order to be a proper counselor, advisor and defense attorney, lawyers should fully understand the intricacies of their own jurisdictions' informed consent laws, which can vary widely from state to state.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.