Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An injured firefighter's entire federal September 11th Victim Compensation Fund award constitutes separate property for the purposes of equitable distribution, a state appeals court in Brooklyn has ruled. A panel of the Appellate Division, Second Department, found that even though economic damages are typically considered part of a marital estate, lawmakers intended for both the economic and noneconomic portions of personal injury awards to be designated separate property.
“While the logic of the Equitable Distribution Law ' suggests the conclusion that the economic portion of a personal injury award should be marital property, [the] legislative history compels the contrary result,” Justice Robert A. Spolzino wrote for the unanimous panel in Howe v. Howe, 07-07984, N.Y.L.J., D.O.I. 10/05/09, p. 17. “[T]he inescapable conclusion is that the Supreme Court was correct in determining that the portion of the Victim Compensation award received by the plaintiff that
constitutes compensation for economic loss during the marriage is the plaintiff's separate property.”
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.