Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Business Crimes Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
November 24, 2009

NEW YORK

Frederic Bourke Sentenced to One Year in Jail After FCPA Trial

Judge Shira Scheindlin of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York sentenced Frederic Bourke ' co-founder of Dooney & Bourke, a maker of high-end handbags ' to one year and one day in jail and fined him $1 million.

Originally indicted in 2005 along with alleged Czech co-conspirator Viktor Kozeny, Bourke, according to the government, was involved in a scheme to obtain control of Azerbijan's state-owned oil company, Socar, using bribery.

The United States government alleged that Bourke invested $8 million in Kozeny's company, Oily Rock, Ltd., and that the investment consortium conspired to pay or paid millions of dollars to Azeri officials to obtain a controlling interest in Socar. According to the government, Bourke knew that, in June 1998, Kozeny arranged to increase the authorized share capital by $300 million in order to use those funds to bribe Azeri officials. In addition, the government alleged that Bourke lied to the FBI by disclaiming knowledge of the payments during interviews.

Bourke had been convicted in July after a six-week jury trial, of conspiracy to violate the FCPA and making false statements. He was, however, acquitted of money-laundering charges.

As a part of the sentence, Bourke will have to serve three years of supervised release after the conclusion of his prison term. Bourke's attorney said that he would appeal to the Second Circuit.

Hedge Fund Managers Found Not Guilty of Fraud

A jury in the Eastern District of New York found Matthew Tannin and Ralph Cioffi, two Bear Stearns hedge fund managers, not guilty of fraud.

The hedge funds managed by Cioffi and Tannin failed in the summer of 2007, costing investors $1.6 billion. Tannin and Cioffi were arrested in June 2008 on allegations that they lied about the stability of the funds. The government's case rested primarily on internal e-mails it claimed showed knowledge that the funds were in trouble even as Tannin and Cioffi were promoting their potential to investors.

The jury also found Cioffi not guilty of insider trading. The government had alleged that he took $2 million of his own money out of one of the failing funds while telling investors that he was investing more.

TEXAS

Enron Broadband Executive Sentenced to Home Confinement

U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore sentenced former Enron broadband finance chief Kevin Howard to one year of probation, including nine months of home confinement, as a result of his plea deal with the government. Under the sentence, Howard will also pay a $25,000 fine.

At the time of his plea, Howard had already been tried twice. His original 2005 trial ended in a hung jury, although several co-defendants were acquitted. He was convicted in his second trial in 2006, but Judge Gilmore later threw out the convictions because of subsequent rulings by the Fifth Circuit addressing the “honest-services” fraud provision under which Howard was convicted. The government had alleged that Howard misled an investor in relation to the risk associated with the sale of futures for a video-on-demand business in 2000. The investor ultimately lost its money after the Enron bankruptcy. Howard pleaded guilty to one count of falsifying books and records. The prosecution stipulated that Howard did not personally benefit from the crime.


Business Crimes Hotline was written by Associate Editor Kenneth S. Clark, an associate at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC. In the Courts was written by Matthew Alexander, an associate in the same office.

NEW YORK

Frederic Bourke Sentenced to One Year in Jail After FCPA Trial

Judge Shira Scheindlin of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York sentenced Frederic Bourke ' co-founder of Dooney & Bourke, a maker of high-end handbags ' to one year and one day in jail and fined him $1 million.

Originally indicted in 2005 along with alleged Czech co-conspirator Viktor Kozeny, Bourke, according to the government, was involved in a scheme to obtain control of Azerbijan's state-owned oil company, Socar, using bribery.

The United States government alleged that Bourke invested $8 million in Kozeny's company, Oily Rock, Ltd., and that the investment consortium conspired to pay or paid millions of dollars to Azeri officials to obtain a controlling interest in Socar. According to the government, Bourke knew that, in June 1998, Kozeny arranged to increase the authorized share capital by $300 million in order to use those funds to bribe Azeri officials. In addition, the government alleged that Bourke lied to the FBI by disclaiming knowledge of the payments during interviews.

Bourke had been convicted in July after a six-week jury trial, of conspiracy to violate the FCPA and making false statements. He was, however, acquitted of money-laundering charges.

As a part of the sentence, Bourke will have to serve three years of supervised release after the conclusion of his prison term. Bourke's attorney said that he would appeal to the Second Circuit.

Hedge Fund Managers Found Not Guilty of Fraud

A jury in the Eastern District of New York found Matthew Tannin and Ralph Cioffi, two Bear Stearns hedge fund managers, not guilty of fraud.

The hedge funds managed by Cioffi and Tannin failed in the summer of 2007, costing investors $1.6 billion. Tannin and Cioffi were arrested in June 2008 on allegations that they lied about the stability of the funds. The government's case rested primarily on internal e-mails it claimed showed knowledge that the funds were in trouble even as Tannin and Cioffi were promoting their potential to investors.

The jury also found Cioffi not guilty of insider trading. The government had alleged that he took $2 million of his own money out of one of the failing funds while telling investors that he was investing more.

TEXAS

Enron Broadband Executive Sentenced to Home Confinement

U.S. District Judge Vanessa Gilmore sentenced former Enron broadband finance chief Kevin Howard to one year of probation, including nine months of home confinement, as a result of his plea deal with the government. Under the sentence, Howard will also pay a $25,000 fine.

At the time of his plea, Howard had already been tried twice. His original 2005 trial ended in a hung jury, although several co-defendants were acquitted. He was convicted in his second trial in 2006, but Judge Gilmore later threw out the convictions because of subsequent rulings by the Fifth Circuit addressing the “honest-services” fraud provision under which Howard was convicted. The government had alleged that Howard misled an investor in relation to the risk associated with the sale of futures for a video-on-demand business in 2000. The investor ultimately lost its money after the Enron bankruptcy. Howard pleaded guilty to one count of falsifying books and records. The prosecution stipulated that Howard did not personally benefit from the crime.


Business Crimes Hotline was written by Associate Editor Kenneth S. Clark, an associate at Kirkland & Ellis LLP, Washington, DC. In the Courts was written by Matthew Alexander, an associate in the same office.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.