Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Customer Awarded for Exposure to Blood at Checkout
In Kulik v. Acme Markets Inc., 172471, Burlington County Superior Court, NJ 03-03-2009, a jury awarded $51,500 to a supermarket patron who licked another customer's blood that got on his fingers after he touched a checkout counter. Lester Kulik was at a self-checkout counter in an Acme supermarket when he noticed blood on his finger. He put his finger in his mouth, thinking that he cut himself. However, employees alerted him that the previous customer at the checkout counter had been bleeding profusely and was escorted out of the store by an employee. Kulik claimed emotional distress for the subsequent six-month wait to receive test results for HIV and hepatitis, which were negative. He was willing to settle for $10,000, but the supermarket only offered $6,000. The jury's award included $1,500 for testing costs.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.